shithub: scc

Info  •  Files  •  Log  •  Branches

Add more comments in README

Some ppl believed that I was wrong about my comments, but this too small
examples will help them to see what are the points.

--- a/README

+++ b/README

@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@

         (int (f))  -> function returning int with one parameter of type f

         (int (f))  -> integer variable f

+If you don't believe me try this code:

+

+int

+f(int g())

+{

+	return g();

+}

+

 Function type names are stupid, because they are used as an alias

 of the function pointer types, but it is stupid that something

 like sizeof(int (int)) is not allowed (because here it should be

@@ -71,3 +79,11 @@

 is the composition of all the definitions find in the file. The exact

 rules are a bit complex (3.7.2), and SCC ignores  them at this moment

 and it does not allow any definition of variables with incomplete type.

+

+If you don't believe me try this code:

+

+struct foo x;

+

+struct foo {

+	int i;

+};