ref: ed8e473581015e14d106b59c5e01210b7a7a43cf
parent: 1f11352c071da81c2f65ae7673415910f7110755
author: sdeng <sdeng@google.com>
date: Wed Jun 5 16:40:16 EDT 2019
Update performance test results for tune=SSIM I made a mistake (used the outdated baseline) in the CL I submitted earlier this week: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/webm/libvpx/+/1638854 The corrected results are following: The additional gains/loss on top of the tune=ssim are: Data Set Overall PSNR SSIM MS-SSIM Lowres 3.490 -3.164 -2.267 Midres 2.245 -2.270 -2.287 HDres 2.562 -1.804 -1.681 Lowres_10bd 3.477 -2.399 -2.689 Midres_10bd 3.467 -1.534 -1.636 The overall gains/loss comparing to tune=psnr are: Data Set Overall PSNR SSIM MS-SSIM Lowres 6.127 -5.818 -4.783 Midres 4.574 -5.383 -6.242 HDres 4.908 -6.218 -7.106 Lowres_10bd 6.115 -6.212 -7.790 Midres_10bd 6.238 -6.064 -7.249 Change-Id: Iae72482f7b30f200e5021a98c920eed841d0972a
--- a/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c
+++ b/vp9/encoder/vp9_encoder.c
@@ -4759,9 +4759,9 @@
// Some sample values are:
// (for midres test set)
// SSIM_VAR_SCALE avg_psnr ssim ms_ssim
-// 8.0 8.980 -5.767 -7.069
-// 16.0 4.315 -5.610 -6.411
-// 32.0 1.559 -4.541 -4.980
+// 8.0 9.421 -5.537 -6.898
+// 16.0 4.703 -5.378 -6.238
+// 32.0 1.929 -4.308 -4.807
#define SSIM_VAR_SCALE 16.0
static void set_mb_ssim_rdmult_scaling(VP9_COMP *cpi) {VP9_COMMON *cm = &cpi->common;